Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Vol. 35 No. 1 (2020): 103, January-April
Research articles

Socioeconomic changes in the 21st century in indigenous Amazonian populations: Current challenges

Victoria Salinas Castro
image/svg+xml Universidad San Francisco de Quito
Bio
Richard E. Bilsborrow
image/svg+xml University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Bio
Clark Gray
image/svg+xml University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Bio

Published 2019-12-09

Keywords

  • indigenous populations,
  • Amazon,
  • Ecuador,
  • ways of life,
  • education,
  • land,
  • environment,
  • development policies
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Salinas Castro, V., Bilsborrow, R. E., & Gray, C. (2019). Socioeconomic changes in the 21st century in indigenous Amazonian populations: Current challenges. Estudios Demográficos Y Urbanos, 35(1), 83–116. https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v35i1.1768
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    2931
  • PDF (español)
    841
  • En línea (español)
    467

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Abstract

The Ecuadorian Amazon is one of the richest biotic areas on earth, with a plurality of indigenous populations. This study seeks to acknowledge the situation of these populations, by analyzing their trends over time through a longitudinal study of the demographic and socioeconomic situation in the first decade of the 21st century. It observes a young population with high fertility, as well as slight decreases in traditional livelihood activities and improved access to services, fostered by greater contact with external actors, such as oil companies, settlers and the government, which at the same time create a socio-environmental complexity that constitutes a challenge now and in the future for the exercise of the rights of indigenous people.

References

  1. Argüello, O. (1981). Estrategias de supervivencia: un concepto en busca de su contenido. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 15(2), 190-203. Recuperado de https://estudiosdemograficosyurbanos.colmex.mx/index.php/edu/article/view/511/504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v15i02.511
  2. Asner, G., Knapp, D., Broadbent, E., Oliveira, P., Keller, M. y Silva, J. (2005). Selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Science, 310, 480-482. Recuperado de https://www.fs.fed.us/global/iitf/pubs/ja_iitf_2005_asner001.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1118051
  3. Barbieri, A., Bilsborrow, R., Mena, C., Pan, W. y Torres, B. (2003). Changes in land cover and land use over time in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Ponencia presentada en el 99th Meeting of Association of American Geographers, Nueva Orleans, LA, Estados Unidos.
  4. Bass, M., Finer, M., Jenkins, C., Kreft, H., Cisneros-Heredia, D., McCracken, S., ... Kunz, T. (2010). Global conservation significance of Ecuador’s Yasuní National Park. PLoS ONE, 5(1), 1-22. Recuperado de https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2808245/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008767
  5. Bilsborrow, R. (1987). Population pressures and agricultural development in developing countries: A conceptual framework and recent evidence. World Development, 15(2), 183-203. Recuperado de https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0305750X87900775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(87)90077-5
  6. Bilsborrow, R., Barbieri, A. y Pan, W. (2004). Changes in population and land use over time in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Acta Amazónica, 34(4), 635-647. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0044-59672004000400015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0044-59672004000400015
  7. Bozigar, M., Gray, C. y Bilsborrow, R. (2016). Oil extraction and indigenous livelihoods in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon. World Development, 78, 125-135. Recuperado de https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X15002570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.035
  8. Byron, N. y Arnold, M. (1999). What futures for the people of the tropical forests? World Development, 27(5), 789-805. Recuperado de https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X9900025X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00025-X
  9. Carr, D., Pan, W. y Bilsborrow, R. (2006). Declining fertility on the frontier: The Ecuadorian Amazon. Population and Environment, 28(1), 17-39. Recuperado de https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2720552/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-007-0032-y
  10. Centro Estudios Población y Desarrollo Social (CEPAR). (2005). Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Materna e Infantil Endemain. Quito, Ecuador: CEPAR.
  11. Chiriboga, M. (1984). Formas tradicionales de organización social y económica en el medio indígena. Quito, Ecuador: Ministerio de Bienestar Social, Oficina Nacional de Asuntos Indígenas.
  12. Conaie. (2014). Situación de las nacionalidades del Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador: Confederación de Nacionalidades Indígenas del Ecuador. Recuperado de la página de internet del organismo (fecha de consulta: 20 de marzo de 2018).
  13. Davis, K. (1963). The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Population Index, 29(4), 345-366. Recuperado de https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~walker/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Davis1963.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2732014
  14. Davis, J., Gray, C. y Bilsborrow, R. (2015). Delayed fertility transition among indigenous women: A case study in the Ecuadorian Amazon. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(1), 1-10. Recuperado de https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4394206/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/4100115
  15. Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford, Reino Unido: University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198296959.001.0001
  16. Finer, M., Jenkins, C., Pimm, S., Keane, B. y Ross, C. (2008). Oil and gas projects in the western Amazon: Threats to wilderness, biodiversity, and indigenous peoples. PLoS ONE, 3(8), e2932. Recuperado de https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002932&type=printable DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002932
  17. Fontaine, G. (2006). La globalización de la Amazonía: una perspectiva andina. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 25, 25-36. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26484065_La_globalizacion_de_la_Amazonia_una_perspectiva_andina_Dossier DOI: https://doi.org/10.17141/iconos.25.2006.163
  18. Forman, R. y Alexander, L. (1998). Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 207-231. Recuperado de https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207
  19. Goodman, R. y Kish, L. (1950). Controlled selection: A technique in probability sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 45(251), 350-372. Recuperado de https://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1950.10501130#.XDjXwlxKiUk DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1950.10501130
  20. Gray, C., Bilsborrow, R., Bremner, J. y Lu, F. (2008). Indigenous land use in the Ecuadorian Amazon: A cross-cultural and multilevel analysis. Human Ecology, 36(1), 97-109. Recuperado de https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10745-007-9141-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-007-9141-6
  21. Hecht, S. (2012). From eco-catastrophe to zero deforestation? Interdisciplinarities, politics, environmentalisms and reduced clearing in Amazonia. Environmental Conservation, 39(1), 4-19. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000452
  22. Keller, M., Bustamante, M., Gash, J. y Dias, P. (eds.) (2009). Amazonia and global change. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/GM186
  23. Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. Nueva York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
  24. Lu, F. y Bilsborrow, R. (2011). A cross-cultural analysis of human impacts on the rainforest environment in Ecuador. En R. P. Cincotta y L. J. Gorenflo (eds.), Human population: Its influences on biological diversity (pp. 127-151). Berlín-Heidelberg: Ecological Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16707-2_8
  25. Lu, F., Bilsborrow, R. y Oña, A. (2010). Modos de vivir y sobrevivir. Un estudio transcultural de cinco etnias en la Amazonia Ecuatoriana. Quito, Ecuador: Abya-Yala.
  26. Macas, L. (2002). La lucha del movimiento indígena en el Ecuador. Boletín ICCI-ARY RIMAY, 4(37). Recuperado de http://icci.nativeweb.org/boletin/37/macas.html
  27. Murphy, L., Bilsborrow, R. y Pichón, F. (1997). Poverty and prosperity among migrant settlers in the Amazon rainforest frontier of Ecuador. The Journal of Development Studies, 34(2), 35-66. Recuperado de https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00220389708422511?needAccess=true DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389708422511
  28. Perz, S., Caldas, M., Arima, E. y Walker, R. (2007). Unofficial road building in the Amazon: Socioeconomic and biophysical explanations. Development and Change, 38(3), 529-551. Recuperado de https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00422.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00422.x
  29. Pimentel, D., McNair, M., Buck, L., Pimentel, M. y Kamil, J. (1997). The value of forests to world food security. Human Ecology, 25(1), 91-120. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/4603227?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021987920278
  30. Rice, R., Sugal, C., Ratay, S. y Fonseca, G. (2001). Sustainable forest management: A review of conventional wisdom (Advances in Applied Biodiversity, 3). Washington, DC: Conservation International. Recuperado de http://www.mekonginfo.org/assets/midocs/0001776-environment-sustainable-forest-management-a-review-of-conventional-wisdom.pdf
  31. Salinas, V. y Bilsborrow, R. (2016). Diferencias en la fecundidad por etnia indígena en la Amazonía del Ecuador. Ponencia presentada en el VII Congreso de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Población y XX Encuentro Nacional de Estudios de Población, Foz do Iguaçu / PR-Brasil, 17 y 22 de octubre.
  32. Santos, F. (1996). Introducción. Hacia una antropología de lo contemporáneo en la Amazonía indígena. En F. Santos Granero (comp.), Globalización y cambio en la Amazonía Indígena (pp. 7-46). Quito, Ecuador: Flacso / ABYA-YALA.
  33. Suárez, E., Morales, M., Cueva, R., Utreras, V., Zapata-Ríos, G., Toral, E. y Vargas, J. (2009). Oil industry, wild meat trade and roads: Indirect effects of oil extraction activities in a protected area in north-eastern Ecuador. Animal Conservation, 12(4), 364-373. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00262.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00262.x
  34. Vasco, C., Bilsborrow, R. y Torres, B. (2015). Income diversification of migrant colonists vs. indigenous populations: Contrasting strategies in the Amazon. Journal of Rural Studies, 42, 1-10. Recuperado de https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074301671530019X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.003