Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Vol. 21 No. 1 (2006): 61, January-April
Research articles

On the Spatial Distribution of Urban Electoral Processes and a Comparison between ols and sam Regression Techniques

Carlos J. Vilalta y Perdomo
image/svg+xml Tecnológico de Monterrey, campus Ciudad de México

Published 2006-01-01

Keywords

  • electoral geography,
  • electoral behavior,
  • urban electorate,
  • spatial statistics,
  • spatial self-correlation,
  • regression analysis,
  • heterodasticity
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Vilalta y Perdomo, C. J. (2006). On the Spatial Distribution of Urban Electoral Processes and a Comparison between ols and sam Regression Techniques. Estudios Demográficos Y Urbanos, 21(1), 83–122. https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v21i1.1262
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    833
  • PDF (español)
    984
  • En línea (español)
    220

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Abstract

The aim of this work is to demonstrate two things: 1) That due to the fact that some social phenomena presents spatial variation, its modeling also presents important methodological implications, and therefore  2) it is advisable to use a regression technique that incorporates data spatiality in its design. A two-step process is followed: First, the Moran autocorrelation coefficient is calculated to demonstrate the spatial concentration of electoral behavior in urban Mexico between 1994 and 2000. Secondly, two regression techniques are compared, OLS and SAM. From the comparison it is concluded that the SAM technique is a more robust technique than the OLS, based on that the former is able to compute more accurate regression coefficients and detects significant regional effects even in the presence of models dealing with the heteroskedasticity problem.