Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Vol. 40 (2025)
Artículos de investigación

¿Cómo entender las trayectorias de los sistemas socioecológicos? Una investigación sobre su conceptualización a través de una revisión sistemática de literatura

pdf

PDF (English)
xml

PDF (Español)
  • María Perevochtchikova,
  • José Álvaro Hernández Flores
María Perevochtchikova
image/svg+xml El Colegio de México, A. C., Centro de Estudios Demográficos, Urbanos y Ambientales
José Álvaro Hernández Flores
image/svg+xml El Colegio de México, A. C., Centro de Estudios Demográficos, Urbanos y Ambientales
Biografía
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v40.e2349

Publicado 2025-09-10

Palabras clave

  • transformaciones,
  • sistemas socioecológicos,
  • tendencias temporales y espaciales

Cómo citar

Perevochtchikova, M., & Hernández Flores, J. Álvaro. (2025). ¿Cómo entender las trayectorias de los sistemas socioecológicos? Una investigación sobre su conceptualización a través de una revisión sistemática de literatura. Estudios Demográficos Y Urbanos, 40, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v40.e2349
Métricas
Vistas/Descargas
  • Resumen
    909
  • PDF (English)
    0
  • PDF (español)
    0

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Derechos de autor 2025 Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Métrica

Resumen

Este trabajo presenta una revisión sistemática de la literatura (RSL) sobre las trayectorias de los sistemas socioecológicos (TSSE) a nivel mundial, con el fin de identificar la literatura científica existente centrada en las definiciones de las TSSE, sus tendencias temporales y espaciales, y los enfoques teóricos y metodológicos aplicados. A partir de esta revisión, se propone una conceptualización general de las TSSE. La muestra incluye 143 artículos seleccionados de la base de datos internacional Scopus, los cuales fueron analizados a partir de 32 variables organizadas en cinco grupos temáticos. Los resultados indican que la mayoría de las publicaciones proceden del Norte Global, mientras que los sitios de estudio se encuentran predominantemente en el Sur Global. Se constata que existen pocas definiciones explícitas del término de TSSE. La conceptualización propuesta incluye múltiples dimensiones, dinámicas temporales (pasadas, presentes y futuras) y espaciales (territoriales). Los estudios de caso se centran principalmente en los beneficios para los seres humanos y en componentes específicos del sistema. Los marcos analíticos predominantes se vinculan con las nociones de sistemas socioecológicos, resiliencia y adaptación; y emplean metodologías cualitativas o cuantitativas desde abordajes multidisciplinarios. Se identifican tres categorías de estudios sobre TSSE: estudios con enfoques de adaptación y de desarrollo (con fines políticos) y estudios de cambio (con fines de investigación). Predominan en la literatura los enfoques centrados en la adaptación y cambio. No obstante, los estudios pertenecientes a las tres categorías coinciden en considerar las trayectorias de los TSSE como vías para avanzar hacia objetivos de sostenibilidad. Entre los principales retos de la investigación se encuentran la realización de investigaciones transversales y sobre equidad, la integración de diversas perspectivas de conocimiento y la adopción de enfoques inter y transdisciplinarios.

pdf

PDF (English)
xml

PDF (Español)

Referencias

  1. Abson, D. J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., von Wehrden, H., Abernethy, P., Ives, C. D., Jager, N. W. y Lang, D. J. (2016). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 46(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y
  2. Arias-Arevalo, P., Martín-López, B. y Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2017). Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 22(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26799016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09812-220443
  3. Arlinghaus, R., Riepe, C., Theis, S., Pagel, T. y Fujitani, M. (2022). Dysfunctional information feedbacks cause the emergence of management panaceas in social-ecological systems: The case of fish stocking in inland recreational fisheries. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 38, 100475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2021.100475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2021.100475
  4. Asase, A., Mzumara, T. I., Owino, J., Peterson, A. T. y Saupe, E. E. (2021). Replacing “parachute science” with “global science” in ecology and conservation biology. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.517
  5. Ávila Foucat, V. S., Torres Freyermuth, A., Esqueda Lara, K., Medellín Mayoral, G., Salgado Nieto, U., González Quintero, C., Ramírez León, A. y Reyna Fabián, M. (2020). Trayectoria de los socioecosistemas costeros. En V. S. Ávila Foucat e I. Espejel (coords.), Resiliencia de socioecosistemas costeros (pp. 134-167). UNAM.
  6. Balvanera, P., Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Perevochtchikova, M., Laterra, P., Cáceres, D. y Langle-Flores, A. (2020). Ecosystem services research in Latin America 2.0: Expanding collaboration across countries, disciplines, and sectors. Ecosystem Services, 42, 101086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101086
  7. Bassett, T. J. y Fogelman, C. (2013). Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate-change literature. Geoforum, 48, 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.010
  8. Berkes, F. y Folke, C. (eds.). (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Berkes, F., Colding, J. y Folke, C. (eds.). (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Binder, C. R., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W. G. y Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05551-180426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05551-180426
  11. Booth, A., Papaioannou, D. y Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235930866
  12. Bostrom, N. (2013). Existential risk prevention as global priority. Global Policy, 4(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12002
  13. Brown, K. (2015). Resilience, development and global change. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203498095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203498095
  14. Chan, K. M. A., Boyd, D. R., Gould, R. K., Jetzkowitz, J., Liu, J., Muraca, B., Naidoo, R., Olmsted, P., Satterfield, T., Selomane, O., Singh, G. G., Sumaila, R., Ngo, H. T., Boedhihartono, A. K., Agard, J., Aguiar, A. P. D., Armenteras, D., Balint, L., Barrington-Leigh, C. y Brondizio, E. S. (2020). Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability. People and Nature, 2(3), 693-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10124
  15. Chen, S., Chen, H., Yang, R. y Ye, Y. (2023). Linking social-ecological management and ecosystem service bundles: Lessons from a peri-urban agriculture landscape. Land Use Policy, 131, 106697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106697 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106697
  16. Ciegis, R., Ramanauskiene, J. y Martinkus, B. (2009). The concept of sustainable development and its use for sustainability scenarios. Engineering Economics, 62(2), 28-37. https://inzeko.ktu.lt/index.php/EE/article/view/11609
  17. Codina, L. (2018). Revisiones bibliográficas sistematizadas: Procedimientos generales y framework para ciencias humanas y sociales. [Máster en Comunicación Social, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona]. https://repositori.upf.edu/items/224872e9-6f79-4666-8ad9-07aad198aa97
  18. Colding, J. y Barthel, S. (2019). Exploring the social-ecological systems discourse 20 years later. Ecology and Society, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10598-240102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10598-240102
  19. Cradock-Henry, N. A., Blackett, P., Connolly, J., Frame, B., Teixeira, E., Johnstone, P. y Wreford, A. (2021). Principles and process for developing participatory adaptation pathways in the primary industries. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.00175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.00175
  20. Cumming, G. S. (2011). Spatial resilience: Integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landscape Ecology, 26(7), 899-909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9623-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9623-1
  21. Debonne, N., Bürgi, M., Diogo, V., Helfenstein, J., Herzog, F., Levers, C., Mohr, F., Swart, R. y Verburg, P. H. (2022). The geography of megatendencies affecting European agriculture. Global Environmental Change, 75, 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102551
  22. De Herde, V., Segers, Y., Maréchal, K. y Baret, P. (2022). Lock-ins to transition pathways anchored in contextualized cooperative dynamics: Insights from the historical trajectories of the Walloon dairy cooperatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 94, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.04.003
  23. De Vos, A., Biggs, R. y Preiser, R. (2019). Methods for understanding social-ecological systems: A review of place-based studies. Ecology and Society, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11236-240416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11236-240416
  24. Duval, G. (2015). Las fronteras móviles de las disciplinas. En A. Argueta y G. Peimbert (coords.), La ruptura de las fronteras imaginarias o de la multi a la transdisciplina (pp. 28-40). UNAM / Siglo X.
  25. Elsawah, S., Hamilton, S. H., Jakeman, A. J., Rothman, D. S., Schweizer, V., Trutnevyte, E., Carlsen, H., Drakes, C., Frame, B., Fu, B., Guivarch, C., Haasnoot, M., Kemp-Benedict, E., Kok, K., Kosow, H., Ryan, M. J. y Van Delden, H. (2020). Scenario processes for socio-environmental systems analysis of futures: A review of recent efforts and a salient research agenda for supporting decision making. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 138393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138393
  26. Fedele, G., Donatti, C. I., Harvey, C. A., Lee, H. y Hole, D. G. (2020). Limited use of transformative adaptation in response to social-ecological shifts driven by climate change. Ecology and Society, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11381-250125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11381-250125
  27. Fischer, J. y Riechers, M. (2019). A leverage-points perspective on sustainability. People and Nature, 1(1), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.13
  28. Fischer-Kowalski, M. y Rotmans, J. (2009). Conceptualizing, observing, and influencing social-ecological transitions. Ecology and Society, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02857-140203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02857-140203
  29. Folke, C. (2016). Resilience [reedición]. Ecology and Society, 21(4), 44. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09088-210444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09088-210444
  30. Ford, J. D., McDowell, G., Shirley, J., Pitre, M., Siewierski, R., Gough, W. A., Duerden, F., Pearce, T., Adams, P. y Statham, S. (2013). The dynamic multiscale nature of climate-change vulnerability: An Inuit harvesting example. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(5), 1193-1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.776880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.776880
  31. Gaube, V., Kaiser, C., Wildenberg, M., Adensam, H., Fleissner, P., Köbler, J., Lutz, J., Schaumberger, A., Schaumberger, J., Smetschka, B., Wolf, A., Richter, A. y Haberl, H. (2009). Combining agent-based and stock-flow modelling approaches in a participative analysis of the integrated land system in Reichraming, Austria. Landscape Ecology, 24(9), 1149-1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9356-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9356-6
  32. Gómez-Santiz, F., Perevochtchikova, M. y Ezzine-De-Blas, D. (2021). Behind the scenes: Scientific networks driving the operationalization of the social-ecological system framework. Science of the Total Environment, 787, 147473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147473
  33. González-Quintero, C. y Ávila-Foucat, V. S. (2019). Operationalization and measurement of social-ecological resilience: A systematic review. Sustainability, 11(21), 6073. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216073
  34. Görg, C., Brand, U., Haberl, H., Hummel, D., Jahn, T. y Liehr, S. (2017). Challenges for social-ecological transformations: Contributions from social and political ecology. Sustainability, 9(7), 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071045
  35. Grant, M. J. y Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  36. Haelewaters, D., Hofmann, T. A. y Romero-Olivares, A. L. (2021). Ten simple rules for Global North researchers to stop perpetuating helicopter research in the Global South. PLOS Computational Biology, 17(8), e1009277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009277
  37. Hazlett, M. A., Henderson, K., Zeitzer, I. F. y Drew, J. A. (2020). The geography of publishing in the Anthropocene. Conservation Science and Practice, 2(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.270
  38. Herrero-Jáuregui, C., Arnaiz-Schmitz, C., Reyes, M. F., Telesnicki, M. C., Agramonte, I., Easdale, M. H., Schmitz, M. F., Aguiar, M. R., Gómez-Sal, A. y Montes, C. (2018). What do we talk about when we talk about social-ecological systems? A literature review. Sustainability, 10(8), 2950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082950
  39. Higgins, J. P. T., Lasserson, T., Chandler, J., Tovey, D., Thomas, J., Flemyng, E. y Churchill, R. (2019). Methodological expectations of Cochrane intervention reviews. Cochrane. https://community.cochrane.org/mecir-manual DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch1
  40. Holzer, J. M., Carmon, N. y Orenstein, D. E. (2018). A methodology for evaluating transdisciplinary research on coupled socio-ecological systems. Ecological Indicators, 85, 808-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.074
  41. Jahel, C., Bourgeois, R., Bourgoin, J., Daré, W., De Lattre-Gasquet, M., Delay, E., Dumas, P., Page, C. L., Piraux, M. y Prudhomme, R. (2023). The future of social-ecological systems at the crossroads of quantitative and qualitative methods. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, 122624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122624
  42. Júnior, W. S. F., Nascimento, A. J. D., Ramos, M. A., De Medeiros, P. M., Soldati, G. T., Santoro, F. R., Reyes-García, V. y Albuquerque, U. P. (2015). Resilience and adaptation in social-ecological systems (pp. 105-119). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19917-7_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19917-7_8
  43. Karpouzoglou, T., Dewulf, A., Perez, K., Gurung, P., Regmi, S., Isaeva, A., Foggin, J. M., Bastiaensen, J., Van Hecken, G., Zulkafli, Z., Mao, F., Clark, J., Hannah, D. M., Chapagain, P. S., Buytaert, W. y Cieslik, K. (2020). From present to future development pathways in fragile mountain landscapes. Environmental Science & Policy, 114, 606-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.016
  44. Krekelberg, B. y Lappe, M. (1999). Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position. Vision Research, 39(16), 2669-2679. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00287-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00287-9
  45. Kuhlman, T. y Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability? Sustainability, 2(11), 3436-3448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2113436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su2113436
  46. Lamarque, P., Artaux, A., Barnaud, C., Dobremez, L., Nettier, B. y Lavorel, S. (2013). Taking into account farmers’ decision making to map fine-scale land-management adaptation to climate and socio-economic scenarios. Landscape and Urban Planning, 119, 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.012
  47. Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M. y Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(supl. 1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
  48. Leenhardt, P., Teneva, L., Kininmonth, S., Darling, E. S., Cooley, S. R. y Claudet, J. (2015). Challenges, insights and perspectives associated with using social-ecological science for marine conservation. Ocean & Coastal Management, 115, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.04.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.04.018
  49. Maas, B., Toomey, A. y Loyola, R. (2019). Exploring and expanding the spaces between research and implementation in conservation science. Biological Conservation, 240, 108290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108290
  50. Mallampalli, V., Mavrommati, G., Thompson, J. R., Duveneck, M. J., Meyer, S. R., Ligmann-Zielinska, A., Druschke, C. G., Hychka, K. C., Kenney, M. A., Kok, K. y Borsuk, M. E. (2016). Methods for translating narrative scenarios into quantitative assessments of land-use change. Environmental Modelling & Software, 82, 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.011
  51. McGinnis, M. D. y Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: Initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230
  52. Meerow, S., Newell, J. P. y Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
  53. Merçon, J., Ayala-Orozco, B. y Rosell, J. A. (2018). Experiencias de colaboración transdisciplinaria para la sustentabilidad. Research Gate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327043190
  54. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P. G. y Stewart, L. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  55. Montoya, F. G., Alcayde, A., Baños, R. y Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2018). A fast method for identifying worldwide scientific collaborations using the Scopus database. Telematics and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.010
  56. Nayak, P. K. (2014). The Chilika Lagoon social-ecological system: An historical analysis. Ecology and Society, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05978-190101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05978-190101
  57. Newton, J. L. y Freyfogle, E. T. (2005). Sustainability: A dissent. Conservation Biology, 19(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.538_1.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00538.x
  58. O’Brien, K. (2012). Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 667-676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425767
  59. Ocampo-Ariza, C., Toledo-Hernández, M., Librán-Embid, F., Armenteras, D., Vansynghel, J., Raveloaritiana, E., Arimond, I., Ángulo-Rubiano, A., Tscharntke, T., Ramírez-Castañeda, V., Wurz, A., Marcacci, G., Anders, M., Urbina-Cardona, J. N., De Vos, A., Devy, S., Westphal, C., Toomey, A., Sheherazade y Maas, B. (2023). Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 21(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2023.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2023.01.002
  60. Odeny, B. y Bosurgi, R. (2022). Time to end parachute science. PLOS Medicine, 19(9), e1004099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004099
  61. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
  62. Palomo, I., Locatelli, B., Otero, I., Colloff, M. J., Crouzat, E., Cuni-Sanchez, A., Gómez-Baggethun, E., González-García, A. C., Grêt-Regamey, A., Jiménez-Aceituno, A., Martín-López, B., Pascual, U., Zafra-Calvo, N., Bruley, E., Fischborn, M., Metz, R. y Lavorel, S. (2021). Assessing nature-based solutions for transformative change. One Earth, 4(5), 730-741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.013
  63. Partelow, S. (2018). A review of the social-ecological systems framework: Applications, methods, modifications, and challenges. Ecology and Society, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10594-230436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10594-230436
  64. Perevochtchikova, M., Gómez-Santiz, F. y Galeana Pizaña, M. (eds.). (2024). ¿Qué vemos y no sabemos? Trayectorias socioecológicas a nivel de cuenca en periferia urbana: Nueva mirada al Suelo de Conservación de la Ciudad de México. El Colegio de México / CentroGeo.
  65. Perevochtchikova, M., Almeida Leñero, L. O., Flores-Díaz, A. C., González, R. y Luque Argaz, D. (2022). ¿Qué sabemos del monitoreo participativo en México? Propuesta conceptual desde la perspectiva socio-ecosistémica y revisión sistemática de literatura científica. Revista Gestión y Política Pública, 31(2), 123-174. https://www.gestionypoliticapublica.cide.edu/ojscide/index.php/gypp/article/view/1259
  66. Perevochtchikova, M., Castro-Díaz, R., Langle-Flores, A. y Von Thaden, J. (2021). A systematic review of scientific publications on the effects of payments for ecosystem services in Latin America, 2000–2020. Ecosystem Services, 49, 101270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101270
  67. Perevochtchikova, M., De La Mora, G., Hernandez, J., Marín, W., Langle-Flores, A., Bueno, A. R. y Negrete, I. A. R. (2019). Systematic review of integrated studies on functional and thematic ecosystem services in Latin America, 1992–2017. Ecosystem Services, 36, 100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100900
  68. Pullin, A. S. y Stewart, G. (2006). Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 20(6), 1647-1656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x
  69. Riechers, M., Brunner, B., Dajka, J., Duse, I. A., Lübker, H. M., Manlosa, A. O., Sala, J. E., Schaal, T. y Weidlich, S. (2021). Leverage points for addressing marine and coastal pollution: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 167, 112263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112263
  70. Schipper, E. L. F. (2006). Conceptual history of adaptation in the UNFCCC process. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 15(1), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2006.00501.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2006.00501.x
  71. Schlüter, M., McAllister, R. R. J., Arlinghaus, R., Bunnefeld, N., Eisenack, K., Hölker, F., Milner-Gulland, E. J., Müller, B., Nicholson, E., Quaas, M. y Stöven, M. (2012). New horizons for managing the environment: A review of coupled social-ecological systems modeling. Natural Resource Modeling, 25(1), 219-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00108.x
  72. Scoones, I. (2016). The politics of sustainability and development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 293-319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039
  73. Sievers-Glotzbach, S. y Tschersich, J. (2019). Overcoming the process-structure divide in conceptions of social-ecological transformation. Ecological Economics, 164, 106361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106361
  74. Stefanoudis, P. V., Licuanan, W. Y., Morrison, T. H., Talma, S., Veitayaki, J. y Woodall, L. C. (2021). Turning the tide of parachute science. Current Biology, 31(4), R184-R185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.029
  75. Stirling, A. (2015). Emancipating transformation: From controlling “the transition” to culturing plural radical progress. En I. Scoones, M. Leach y P. Newell (eds.), The politics of green transformations: Pathways to sustainability. Routledge.
  76. Stockholm Environmental Institute & Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. (2017). The systematic review and map methodology course. SEI. https://systematicreviewmethods.github.io/dec.html
  77. Toman, M. A. (2010). The difficulty in defining sustainability. En The RFF reader in environmental and resource policy (pp. 267-272). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781936331642-54
  78. Varis, O., Taka, M. y Kummu, M. (2019). The planet’s stressed river basins: Too much pressure or too little adaptive capacity? Earth’s Future, 7(10), 1118-1135. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001239
  79. Virapongse, A., Brooks, S. K., Metcalf, E. C., Zedalis, M., Gosz, J. R., Kliskey, A. y Alessa, L. (2016). A social-ecological systems approach for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 178, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.028
  80. Visser, M., van Eck, N. J. y Waltman, L. (2020). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1). https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/2/1/20/97574/Large-scale-comparison-of-bibliographic-data DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a