Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Vol. 37 Núm. 3 (2022): 111, septiembre-diciembre
Artículos

Procesos de la transición urbana a sistemas autónomos descentralizados de energía renovable

Simone Di Pietro
Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Department of Spatial and Environmental Planning
Biografía

Publicado 2022-09-22

Palabras clave

  • dinámicas de cambio urbano,
  • producción descentralizada de energía,
  • planificación territorial,
  • energías renovables,
  • gobernanza energética,
  • democracia energética.
  • ...Más
    Menos

Cómo citar

Di Pietro, S. (2022). Procesos de la transición urbana a sistemas autónomos descentralizados de energía renovable. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 37(3), 807–837. https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v37i3.2073
Metrics
Vistas/Descargas
  • Resumen
    1022
  • pdf
    684
  • En línea
    46
  • EPUB
    26
  • Kindle
    60
  • Audio
    8

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métrica

Resumen

La reconfiguración social de las tecnologías, así como la de los sistemas sociales e institucionales que permiten su surgimiento y uso, es indispensable para la sostenibilidad. El presente trabajo profundiza los procesos de transición energética urbana mediante la adopción de sistemas autónomos/descentralizados de energía renovable, en el contexto de las dinámicas de cambio urbano. El avance de este proceso resulta fuertemente dependiente de la competencia entre los actores participantes del proceso de planificación energética urbana. Se utiliza una metodología basada en la revisión de la literatura con el fin de proponer un aporte teórico.

Referencias

  1. Adil, M. A. y Ko, Y. (2016). Socio-technical evolution of decentralized energy systems: A critical review and implications for urban planning and policy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 1025-1037. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032115014628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.079
  2. Aguirre, F. J. (2009). Desarrollo territorial en contextos metropolitanos. Revista Latinoamericana, Polis, 22, 67-81. https://journals.openedition.org/polis/2622?lang=fr
  3. Ahn, T. K., Ostrom, E. y Walker, J. M. (2002). Incorporating motivational heterogeneity into game theoretic models of collective action. Ponencia presentada en la reunión de la Public Choice Society. San Diego: Estados Unidos. http://hdl.handle.net/10535/1186
  4. Ariza-Montobbio, P., Farrell, N. K., Gamboa, G. y Ramos-Martin, J. (2014). Integrating energy and land-use planning: Socio-methabolic profiles along the rural-urban continuum in Catalonia (Spain). Environment Development and Sustainability, 16(4) 925-956. https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v16y2014i4p925-956.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9533-x
  5. Arocena, J. (1995a). Centralización y descentralización territorial. En J. Arocena, El desarrollo local: un desafío contemporáneo (pp. 93-116). Uruguay: Taurus / Universidad Católica.
  6. Arocena, J. (1995b). El desarrollo local: un desafío contemporáneo. Uruguay: Taurus / Universidad Católica.
  7. Audirac, I., Cunningham Sabot, E., Fol, S., Torres Moraes, S. (2012). Declining suburbs in Europe and Latin America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36(2), 226-44. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01093.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01093.x
  8. Balest, J., Secco, L., Pisani, E. y Garegnani, G. (2019). Municipal transitions: The social, energy, and spatial dynamics of sociotechnical change in South Tyrol, Italy. Energy Research and Social Sciences, 54, 211-223. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629618309903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.015
  9. Becker, S., Moss, T. y Naumann, M. (2016). The importance of space: Towards a socio-material and political geography of energy transitions. En L. Gailing y T. Moss (eds.), Conceptualizing Germany’s energy transition: Institutions, materiality, power (pp. 93-108). Londres: Palgrave Pivot. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50593-4_6
  10. Bontje, M. (2004). Facing the challenge of shrinking cities in East Germany: The case of Leipzig. GeoJournal, 61, 13-21. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10708-005-0843-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-005-0843-2
  11. Bookchin, M. (1962). Our synthetic environment. Nueva York: Knopf.
  12. Brinkley, C. (2014). Decoupled: Successful planning policies in countries that have reduced per capita greenhouse gas emissions with continued economic growth. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 32(6), 1083-1099. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c12202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/c12202
  13. Buhnik, S. (2017). The dynamics of urban degrowth in Japanese metropolitan areas: What are the outcomes of urban recentralisation strategies? Town Planning Review, 88(1), 79-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2017.7
  14. Burke, M. J. y Stephens, J. C. (2018). Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research and Social Sciences, 35, 78-93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617303468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018
  15. Caineng, Z., Qun, Z., Guosheng, Z. y Bo, X. (2016). Energy revolution: From a fossil energy era to a new energy era. Natural Gas Industry B, 3, 1-11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352854016300109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2016.02.001
  16. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
  17. Castells, M. (2004). The network society: A cross-cultural perspective. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Pub. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845421663
  18. Chandrashekeran, S. (2016). Multidimensionality and the multilevel perspective: Territory, scale, and networks in a failed demand-side energy transition in Australia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(8), 1636-1656. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X16643728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16643728
  19. De Pascali, P. y Bagaini, A. (2018). Energy transition and urban planning for local development. A critical review of the evolution of integrated spatial and energy planning. Energies, 12(35), 1-21. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2018i1p35-d192728.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12010035
  20. Departamento de Energía de Estados Unidos. (2014). Microgrid research, development and system design. https://www.federalgrants.com/Microgrid-Research-Development-and-System-Design-44627.html
  21. Dewar, M. y Thomas, J. M. (2013). The city after abandonment. Filadelfia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812207309
  22. Donahue, E. J. (2019). Microgrids: Applications, solutions, case studies, and demonstrations. En M. Ghofrani (ed.), Micro-grids: Applications, operation, control and protection (pp. 3-24). Londres: IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/books/micro-grids-applications-operation-control-and-protection/microgrids-applications-solutions-case-studies-and-demonstrations
  23. ENEA. (2018). Ensuring steady cash flows in off-grid solar microgrid projects. https://www.enea-consulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ENEA-Consutling-Ensuring-steady-cash-flows-in-off-grid-solar-microgrid-projects-2018.pdf
  24. Fairchild, D. y Weinrub, A. (2017). Energy democracy: Advancing equity in clean energy solutions. Washington: Island Press. https://islandpress.org/sites/default/files/9781610918510_excerpt.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-852-7
  25. Ferroni, F. y Hopkirk, J. (2016). Energy return on energy invested (ERoEI) for photovoltaic solar systems in regions of moderate insolation. Energy Policy, 94, 336-3844. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421516301379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.034
  26. Förch, S. y Pallagst, K. (2019). Energy sector. Energy park Mont-Cenis in the city of Herne. En K. Pallagst, J. G. Vargas Hernández, P. Hammer, B. Blaser, L. Albert, D. Graul y D. Garza Tristán, The role of green innovation areas in revitalizing German and Mexican German cities (pp. 146-165). Ibiza, España: Fondo Editorial Universitario.
  27. Gailing, L., Bues, A., Kern, K. y Rohring, A. (2019). Socio-spatial dimensions in energy transitions: Applying the TPSN framework to case studies in Germany. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(6), 1-19. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X19845142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19845142
  28. Hajer, M. A. y Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490934
  29. Hall, C. y Klitgaard, K. (2012). Energy and the wealth of nations. Understanding the biophysical economy. Nueva York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9398-4
  30. Henriot, C., Artis, A., Molines, N., Seigneuret, N., Antaluca, E., Lamarque, F. y Bogalska-Martin, E. (2019). The energy justice tool suite: An interdisciplinary and comprehensive method for energy transition territorialisation. Ponencia presentada en la conferencia “Smart cities and regions informing the energy transition”. AESOP, Venecia, Italia. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02187895/document
  31. Hoekveld, J. J. (2012). Time-space relations and the differences between shrinking regions. Built Environment, 38(2), 179-195. https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=3eafe681-5888-4192-b05b-e7ce4c06afe1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.38.2.179
  32. Jacobs, J. (1961). Muerte y vida de las grandes ciudades. Madrid: Península.
  33. Jung, W., Hardes, A. y Schröder, W. (2010). From industrial area to solar area. The redevelopment of brownfields and old building stock with clean energy solutions (city of Gelsenkirchen, Germany). En M. Van Staden y F. Musco (eds.), Local governments and climate change: Sustainable energy planning and implementation in small and medium sized communities (pp. 1-12). Nueva York: Springer.
  34. Kuhn, T. (1991). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  35. Machler, L. y Milz, D. (2015). The evolution of communicative planning theory. Groningen, Países Bajos: InPlanning.
  36. McEwan, C. (2017). Spatial processes and politics of renewable energy transition: Land, zones and frictions in South Africa. Political Geographies, 56, 1-12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629816301925?via%3Dihub DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.10.001
  37. Mitchell, A. D. y Casben, J. (2016). Natural resources and energy regulation in Australia: The energy white paper in context. En M. Matsushita y T. Schoenbaum (eds.), Emerging issues in sustainable development: International trade law and policy relating to natural resources, energy, and the environment (pp. 3-25). Japón: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56426-3_1
  38. Mulligan, H. (2013). Environmental sustainability issues for shrinking cities. US and Europe. En K. Pallagst, T. Wiechmann y C. Martínez-Fernandez (eds.), Shrinking cities. International perspectives and policy implications (pp. 279-302). Nueva York: Routledge.
  39. Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and civilization. Nueva York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
  40. Murdoch, J. III. (2016). Specialized vs. diversified: The role of neighborhood economies in shrinking cities. Cities, 75, 30-37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264275116302876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.006
  41. Negri, A. y Hardt, M. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  42. ONU Hábitat. (2016). La nueva agenda urbana. Trabajo presentado en la Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre Vivenda y Desarrollo Urbano Sostenible (Hábitat III). Ecuador: Secretaría de Hábitat III. http://uploads.habitat3.org/hb3/NUA-Spanish.pdf
  43. Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (2018). Las ciudades seguirán creciendo, sobre todo en los países en desarrollo. Departamento de Asuntos Económicos y Sociales. https://www.un.org/development/desa/es/news/population/2018-world-urbanization-prospects.html
  44. Ortega Guerrero, G. A. y Roth Deubel, A. (2014). Participación y deliberación comunitaria en el análisis de políticas públicas sobre bienes comunes y ambientales. Revista Perspectivas de Políticas Públicas, 4(7), 127-153. http://revistas.unla.edu.ar/perspectivas/article/view/667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18294/rppp.2014.667
  45. Ostrom, V. y Ostrom, E. (1977). Public goods and public choices. En E. S. Savas (ed.), Alternatives for delivering public services (pp. 7-49). Boulder: Westview Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429047978-2
  46. Pestoff, V. (2012). New public governance, co-production and the third sector social services in Europe: Crowding in and crowding out. En V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen y B. Verschuere (eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production (pp. 361-380). Nueva York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203152294
  47. Phillips, R. (1977). The garden city movement: Its origins and influence on early modern town planning. (Tesis de maestría, University of British Columbia, Estados Unidos). https://summit.sfu.ca/item/2894
  48. Pitt, D. y Bassett, E. (2014). Innovation and the role of collaborative planning in local clean energy policy. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(6), 377-390. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/eet.1653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1653
  49. Rhineland-Palatinate Energy Agency. (2014). Energy transition in the state of Rhineland Palatinate, Germany. Mainz: Ministry for Economic Affairs, Climate Protection, Energy and Regional Planning Rhineland-Palatinate. https://www.edoweb-rlp.de/resource/edoweb:7001812/data
  50. Rodríguez Lombardo, M. (2019). Ciencia ciudadana y la justicia de los saberes. Alambique. Revista de la Universidad de México, 131-134. https://www.revistadelauniversidad.mx/download/234a9ce4-6f20-4dac-9c3c-f4f99fe30f41?filename=ciencia-ciudadana-y-la-justicia-de-los-saberes
  51. Rueda, S. (1998). La ciudad compacta y diversa frente a la conurbación difusa. Ciudades para un futuro más sostenible. Madrid: Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Transportes y Medio Ambiente. http://habitat.aq.upm.es/cs/p2/a009.html
  52. Sánchez, R. (2013). Las dinámicas urbanas. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 56, 5-6. https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rgeong/n56/art01.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022013000300001
  53. Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400847488
  54. Shellenberger, M. (2019). The reason renewables can’t power modern civilization is because they were never meant to. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/05/06/the-reason-renewables-cant-power-modern-civilization-is-because-they-were-never-meant-to/
  55. Smil, V. (2004). World history and energy. Encyclopedia Energy, 6, 549-561. http://vaclavsmil.com/wp-content/uploads/docs/smil-article-2004world-history-energy.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00025-5
  56. Travers, T. (2013). Las ciudades y la resolución de conflictos. En J. E. Stiglitz y M. Kaldor (eds.), La búsqueda de la seguridad, protección sin proteccionismo y el desafío de la gobernanza global, (pp. 359-373). Ciudad de México: Paidós.